It Begins: Two Major Ontario Municipalities Opt-Out Of Retail Cannabis Sales
One of the less talked about details of Ontario’s new retail strategy threatens to seep back into the market’s consciousness again. While the market reacted negatively Tuesday on word that retail cannabis sales would be delayed until April 1st, the municipal opt-out clause became somewhat of an afterthought. Perhaps that was premature.
As reported by CTV New Toronto yesterday evening, two major Ontario localities have already rejected hosting retail cannabis stores in their backyard. Richmond Hill Mayor Dave Burrow stated that while some residents disagree with his stance, city council will not move forward. “We’re not a willing host of recreation retail outlet… We had a number of people attend our council meetings and say they weren’t interested in being a part of any of this process.”
Ditto with Markham Mayor Frank Scarpitti, whose office issued the following statement: ““When approached by the previous government to be one of the first locations, Mayor Scarpitti rejected that opportunity and subsequently council also passed a motion rejecting a retail outlet.”
Additionally, the northern Toronto suburb of Vaughn remained vague on whether it would allow retail cannabis outlets within its boundaries, stating “Vaughan staff continue to monitor government announcements closely. Staff will bring forward a report to council, at the earliest possible time, to seek direction from council to determine if the City of Vaughan will have physical retail cannabis stores.”
According to 2016 census data, Richmond Hill had a population of 195,022 people, while Markham hosted 328,966 people. Combined, both cities make up just under four percent of the province total population, which stood at 13,448,494 in 2016. Should Vaughn ultimately opt-out, another 105,228 residents would be forced to procure cannabis by mail order or by venturing to surrounding districts.
Both Richmond Hill and Markham chose to exercise their opt-out right detailed by the Ford government on August 13th. As part of the province’s revised cannabis strategy, the government granted unconditional (one-time) optionality for municipalities to disallow retail cannabis outlets in local jurisdictions at regional council discretion. Theoretically, retail cannabis sales could be outlawed province-wide despite cannabis being legal at the federal level.
In practice, two such high-profile communities have already exercised this right. How many more lie in wait?
While this story doesn’t qualify as material in an actionable market sense, it won’t help crystallize sentiment ahead of the October legalization lead-up. Retail cannabis sales have already been delayed until April 2019, acting to elongate the revenue cycle in a material way. And now, two major municipalities have already expressed intentions to remain off-grid.
In the grand scheme, the net effect to aggregate cannabis sales should be negligible; a rounding error if you will. Determined buyers can still purchase product in neighboring locales or online. But it’s still a situation worth monitoring, lest even more conservative parts of Ontario decide to follow suit.
Midas Letter is provided as a source of information only, and is in no way to be construed as investment advice. James West, the author and publisher of the Midas Letter, is not authorized to provide investor advice, and provides this information only to readers who are interested in knowing what he is investing in and how he reaches such decisions.
Investing in emerging public companies involves a high degree of risk and investors in such companies could lose all their money. Always consult a duly accredited investment professional in your jurisdiction prior to making any investment decision.
Midas Letter occasionally accepts fees for advertising and sponsorship from public companies featured on this site. James West and/or Midas Letter may also receive compensation from companies affiliated with companies featured on this site. James West and/or Midas Letter also invests in companies on this site and so readers should view all information on this site as biased.