Battery Materials Review Managing Editor Matt Fernley on EV & Battery Sectors
Battery Materials Review tracks companies exploring for and developing materials for battery manufacturing, such as Cobalt, Graphite, Lithium, Manganese, Nickel, REE and Vanadium.
The one-stop-shop to learn about the battery sector also monitors key scientific and technical developments, monthly sales and trade flows, raw materials markets and prices, and sector equity baskets to highlight key trends that will be of interest to investors.
Battery Materials Review is designed for investors, Corporates, industry professionals and those with an interest in the upstream and downstream battery materials markets.
Transcript
🔋 Battery Materials Review (00:00)
🧑💻 Battery Materials Review focus & coverage (00:43)
🚗 Battery production plans in North America (02:04)
🇨🇦 Canadian battery industry is in a great spot (04:51)
📈 Lithium price to converge to spot price overtime (06:27)
🚙 EV price rise & sales forecast (10:15)
🧪 Realistic alternative battery chemistries? (13:45)
Related Articles
April 18, 2022
Lithium Price versus Reality
Disclosure
Midas Letter is provided as a source of information only, and is in no way to be construed as investment advice. James West, the author and publisher of the Midas Letter, is not authorized to provide investor advice, and provides this information only to readers who are interested in knowing what he is investing in and how he reaches such decisions.
Investing in emerging public companies involves a high degree of risk and investors in such companies could lose all their money. Always consult a duly accredited investment professional in your jurisdiction prior to making any investment decision.
Midas Letter occasionally accepts fees for advertising and sponsorship from public companies featured on this site. James West and/or Midas Letter may also receive compensation from companies affiliated with companies featured on this site. James West and/or Midas Letter also invests in companies on this site and so readers should view all information on this site as biased.
